Sorry to sound dismissive before, I really do enjoy these discussions!
I concur there are differences in the numbers. However, these seemed to be within acceptable parameters when we did the refactor and subsequent QA. It is entirely possible the 2.0 code is actually more accurate now hence the discrepancies in older bgva profiles. I’m just glad we are using a single core processing codebase so we have total consistency moving forward.
More importantly, if ever you find an older profile sounds better than a new one, please let us know! We will do whatever is necessary with the newer tools to duplicate the original effect.
Thanks for the helpful feedback.